Thursday, December 31, 2009

Happy New Year, and Top Ten Worst

Happy New Year, y'all. I hope the coming year shows us recovering some of our country that's been lost the last year.

Being way out of the mainstream, I don't remember all of the events of the year, but the ones I do remember, the first half-black Kenyan being sworn in as President of our once great country...followed by his year long apology tour, topped off by the first two terrorist attacks on American soil since 9/11. I do remember he became the first president to make a special trip to get the Olympics for his hood...Chicago.

I also seem to remember he was abetted by the other half of his cage, with support from the female O. And, didn't they take separate aircraft?...at our expense. Didn't that happen more than once, because when he was on some of his apology tours, and making stops in Muslim countries, his lovely spouse could not go with him.

But, according to a caller on Rush's show, Chicago is much better off since he left. Apparently the crime rate is lower, because as the caller said, most of their crooks left town for DC. And, speaking of Rush, our prayers are with him as he recovers in Hawaii. I understand he's resting comfortably. I'm sure he's getting the best care available, even if it had to be flown in.

I heard Thomas Sowell on Rush's show today, talking to guest host Walter E. Williams, say that he had seen on the net that Rush was dead...they decided it was just wishful thinking on the part of the left!;~)) I would not be surprised.

I had a forward from a friend of a very interesting top-ten list compiled by Judicial Watch. I was going to suggest which one to read, if you're pressed for time, but they're all so unbelievably scandalous, I couldn't pick one...they're listed in alphabetical order, and the list includes just about everyone in the current White House. I'll try to copy it below:

We need to get each state’s voters to put these guys out of office and in jail where they belong, right up there with the Terrorists.

Maybe a few weeks in Guantanamo Bay in the same cells with the prisoners would help their corrupt thinking.




Judicial Watch Announces List of Washington’s “Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians” for 2009

Contact Information:
Press Office 202-646-5172, ext 305


Washington, DC Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, today released its 2009 list of Washington’s “Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians.” The list, in alphabetical order, includes:


1. Senator Christopher Dodd (D-CT): This marks two years in a row for Senator Dodd, who made the 2008 “Ten Most Corrupt” list for his corrupt relationship with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and for accepting preferential treatment and loan terms from Countrywide Financial, a scandal which still dogs him. In 2009, the scandals kept coming for the Connecticut Democrat. In 2009, Judicial Watch filed a Senate ethics complaint against Dodd for undervaluing a property he owns in Ireland on his Senate Financial Disclosure forms. Judicial Watch's complaint forced Dodd to amend the forms. However, press reports suggest the property to this day remains undervalued. Judicial Watch also alleges in the complaint that Dodd obtained a sweetheart deal for the property in exchange for his assistance in obtaining a presidential pardon (during the Clinton administration) and other favors for a long-time friend and business associate. The false financial disclosure forms were part of the cover-up. Dodd remains the head the Senate Banking Committee.


2. Senator John Ensign (R-NV): A number of scandals popped up in 2009 involving public officials who conducted illicit affairs, and then attempted to cover them up with hush payments and favors, an obvious abuse of power. The year’s worst offender might just be Nevada Republican Senator John Ensign. Ensign admitted in June to an extramarital affair with the wife of one of his staff members, who then allegedly obtained special favors from the Nevada Republican in exchange for his silence. According to The New York Times: “The Justice Department and the Senate Ethics Committee are expected to conduct preliminary inquiries into whether Senator John Ensign violated federal law or ethics rules as part of an effort to conceal an affair with the wife of an aide…” The former staffer, Douglas Hampton, began to lobby Mr. Ensign's office immediately upon leaving his congressional job, despite the fact that he was subject to a one-year lobbying ban. Ensign seems to have ignored the law and allowed Hampton lobbying access to his office as a payment for his silence about the affair. (These are potentially criminal offenses.) It looks as if Ensign misused his public office (and taxpayer resources) to cover up his sexual shenanigans.


3. Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA): Judicial Watch is investigating a $12 million TARP cash injection provided to the Boston-based OneUnited Bank at the urging of Massachusetts Rep. Barney Frank. As reported in the January 22, 2009, edition of the Wall Street Journal, the Treasury Department indicated it would only provide funds to healthy banks to jump-start lending. Not only was OneUnited Bank in massive financial turmoil, but it was also "under attack from its regulators for allegations of poor lending practices and executive-pay abuses, including owning a Porsche for its executives' use." Rep. Frank admitted he spoke to a "federal regulator," and Treasury granted the funds. (The bank continues to flounder despite Frank’s intervention for federal dollars.) Moreover, Judicial Watch uncovered documents in 2009 that showed that members of Congress for years were aware that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were playing fast and loose with accounting issues, risk assessment issues and executive compensation issues, even as liberals led by Rep. Frank continued to block attempts to rein in the two Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSEs). For example, during a hearing on September 10, 2003, before the House Committee on Financial Services considering a Bush administration proposal to further regulate Fannie and Freddie, Rep. Frank stated: "I want to begin by saying that I am glad to consider the legislation, but I do not think we are facing any kind of a crisis. That is, in my view, the two Government Sponsored Enterprises we are talking about here, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, are not in a crisis. We have recently had an accounting problem with Freddie Mac that has led to people being dismissed, as appears to be appropriate. I do not think at this point there is a problem with a threat to the Treasury." Frank received $42,350 in campaign contributions from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac between 1989 and 2008. Frank also engaged in a relationship with a Fannie Mae Executive while serving on the House Banking Committee, which has jurisdiction over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

4. Secretary of Treasury Timothy Geithner: In 2009, Obama Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner admitted that he failed to pay $34,000 in Social Security and Medicare taxes from 2001-2004 on his lucrative salary at the International Monetary Fund (IMF), an organization with 185 member countries that oversees the global financial system. (Did we mention Geithner now runs the IRS?) It wasn’t until President Obama tapped Geithner to head the Treasury Department that he paid back most of the money, although the IRS kindly waived the hefty penalties. In March 2009, Geithner also came under fire for his handling of the AIG bonus scandal, where the company used $165 million of its bailout funds to pay out executive bonuses, resulting in a massive public backlash. Of course as head of the New York Federal Reserve, Geithner helped craft the AIG deal in September 2008. However, when the AIG scandal broke, Geithner claimed he knew nothing of the bonuses until March 10, 2009. The timing is important. According to CNN: “Although Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner told congressional leaders on Tuesday that he learned of AIG's impending $160 million bonus payments to members of its troubled financial-products unit on March 10, sources tell TIME that the New York Federal Reserve informed Treasury staff that the payments were imminent on Feb. 28. That is ten days before Treasury staffers say they first learned ‘full details’ of the bonus plan, and three days before the [Obama] Administration launched a new $30 billion infusion of cash for AIG.” Throw in another embarrassing disclosure in 2009 that Geithner employed “household help” ineligible to work in the United States, and it becomes clear why the Treasury Secretary has earned a spot on the “Ten Most Corrupt Politicians in Washington” list.


5. Attorney General Eric Holder: Tim Geithner can be sure he won’t be hounded about his tax-dodging by his colleague Eric Holder, US Attorney General. Judicial Watch strongly opposed Holder because of his terrible ethics record, which includes: obstructing an FBI investigation of the theft of nuclear secrets from Los Alamos Nuclear Laboratory; rejecting multiple requests for an independent counsel to investigate alleged fundraising abuses by then-Vice President Al Gore in the Clinton White House; undermining the criminal investigation of President Clinton by Kenneth Starr in the midst of the Lewinsky investigation; and planning the violent raid to seize then-six-year-old Elian Gonzalez at gunpoint in order to return him to Castro’s Cuba. Moreover, there is his soft record on terrorism. Holder bypassed Justice Department procedures to push through Bill Clinton’s scandalous presidential pardons and commutations, including for 16 members of FALN, a violent Puerto Rican terrorist group that orchestrated approximately 120 bombings in the United States, killing at least six people and permanently maiming dozens of others, including law enforcement officers. His record in the current administration is no better. As he did during the Clinton administration, Holder continues to ignore serious incidents of corruption that could impact his political bosses at the White House. For example, Holder has refused to investigate charges that the Obama political machine traded VIP access to the White House in exchange for campaign contributions – a scheme eerily similar to one hatched by Holder’s former boss, Bill Clinton in the 1990s. The Holder Justice Department also came under fire for dropping a voter intimidation case against the New Black Panther Party. On Election Day 2008, Black Panthers dressed in paramilitary garb threatened voters as they approached polling stations. Holder has also failed to initiate a comprehensive Justice investigation of the notorious organization ACORN (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now), which is closely tied to President Obama. There were allegedly more than 400,000 fraudulent ACORN voter registrations in the 2008 campaign. And then there were the journalist videos catching ACORN Housing workers advising undercover reporters on how to evade tax, immigration, and child prostitution laws. Holder’s controversial decisions on new rights for terrorists and his attacks on previous efforts to combat terrorism remind many of the fact that his former law firm has provided and continues to provide pro bono representation to terrorists at Guantanamo Bay. Holder’s politicization of the Justice Department makes one long for the days of Alberto Gonzales.


6. Rep. Jesse Jackson, Jr. (D-IL)/ Senator Roland Burris (D-IL): One of the most serious scandals of 2009 involved a scheme by former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich to sell President Obama’s then-vacant Senate seat to the highest bidder. Two men caught smack dab in the middle of the scandal: Senator Roland Burris, who ultimately got the job, and Rep. Jesse Jackson, Jr. According to the Chicago Sun-Times, emissaries for Jesse Jackson Jr., named "Senate Candidate A" in the Blagojevich indictment, reportedly offered $1.5 million to Blagojevich during a fundraiser if he named Jackson Jr. to Obama's seat. Three days later federal authorities arrested Blagojevich. Burris, for his part, apparently lied about his contacts with Blagojevich, who was arrested in December 2008 for trying to sell Obama’s Senate seat. According to Reuters: “Roland Burris came under fresh scrutiny…after disclosing he tried to raise money for the disgraced former Illinois governor who named him to the U.S. Senate seat once held by President Barack Obama…In the latest of those admissions, Burris said he looked into mounting a fundraiser for Rod Blagojevich -- later charged with trying to sell Obama's Senate seat -- at the same time he was expressing interest to the then-governor's aides about his desire to be appointed.” Burris changed his story five times regarding his contacts with Blagojevich prior to the Illinois governor appointing him to the U.S. Senate. Three of those changing explanations came under oath.


7. President Barack Obama: During his presidential campaign, President Obama promised to run an ethical and transparent administration. However, in his first year in office, the President has delivered corruption and secrecy, bringing Chicago-style political corruption to the White House. Consider just a few Obama administration “lowlights” from year one: Even before President Obama was sworn into office, he was interviewed by the FBI for a criminal investigation of former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich’s scheme to sell the President’s former Senate seat to the highest bidder. (Obama’s Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel and slumlord Valerie Jarrett, both from Chicago, are also tangled up in the Blagojevich scandal.) Moreover, the Obama administration made the startling claim that the Privacy Act does not apply to the White House. The Obama White House believes it can violate the privacy rights of American citizens without any legal consequences or accountability. President Obama boldly proclaimed that "transparency and the rule of law will be the touchstones of this presidency," but his administration is addicted to secrecy, stonewalling far too many of Judicial Watch's Freedom of Information Act requests and is refusing to make public White House visitor logs as federal law requires. The Obama administration turned the National Endowment of the Arts (as well as the agency that runs the AmeriCorps program) into propaganda machines, using tax dollars to persuade "artists" to promote the Obama agenda. According to documents uncovered by Judicial Watch, the idea emerged as a direct result of the Obama campaign and enjoyed White House approval and participation. President Obama has installed a record number of "czars" in positions of power. Too many of these individuals are leftist radicals who answer to no one but the president. And too many of the czars are not subject to Senate confirmation (which raises serious constitutional questions). Under the President’s bailout schemes, the federal government continues to appropriate or control -- through fiat and threats -- large sectors of the private economy, prompting conservative columnist George Will to write: “The administration's central activity -- the political allocation of wealth and opportunity -- is not merely susceptible to corruption, it is corruption.” Government-run healthcare and car companies, White House coercion, uninvestigated ACORN corruption, debasing his office to help Chicago cronies, attacks on conservative media and the private sector, unprecedented and dangerous new rights for terrorists, perks for campaign donors – this is Obama’s “ethics” record -- and we haven't even gotten through the first year of his presidency.


8. Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA): At the heart of the corruption problem in Washington is a sense of entitlement. Politicians believe laws and rules (even the U.S. Constitution) apply to the rest of us but not to them. Case in point: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her excessive and boorish demands for military travel. Judicial Watch obtained documents from the Pentagon in 2008 that suggest Pelosi has been treating the Air Force like her own personal airline. These documents, obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, include internal Pentagon email correspondence detailing attempts by Pentagon staff to accommodate Pelosi's numerous requests for military escorts and military aircraft as well as the speaker's 11th hour cancellations and changes. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi also came under fire in April 2009, when she claimed she was never briefed about the CIA's use of the waterboarding technique during terrorism investigations. The CIA produced a report documenting a briefing with Pelosi on September 4, 2002, that suggests otherwise. Judicial Watch also obtained documents, including a CIA Inspector General report, which further confirmed that Congress was fully briefed on the enhanced interrogation techniques. Aside from her own personal transgressions, Nancy Pelosi has ignored serious incidents of corruption within her own party, including many of the individuals on this list. (See Rangel, Murtha, Jesse Jackson, Jr., etc.)


9. Rep. John Murtha (D-PA) and the rest of the PMA Seven: Rep. John Murtha made headlines in 2009 for all the wrong reasons. The Pennsylvania congressman is under federal investigation for his corrupt relationship with the now-defunct defense lobbyist PMA Group. PMA, founded by a former Murtha associate, has been the congressman's largest campaign contributor. Since 2002, Murtha has raised $1.7 million from PMA and its clients. And what did PMA and its clients receive from Murtha in return for their generosity? Earmarks -- tens of millions of dollars in earmarks. In fact, even with all of the attention surrounding his alleged influence peddling, Murtha kept at it. Following an FBI raid of PMA's offices earlier in 2009, Murtha continued to seek congressional earmarks for PMA clients, while also hitting them up for campaign contributions. According to The Hill, in April, "Murtha reported receiving contributions from three former PMA clients for whom he requested earmarks in the pending appropriations bills." When it comes to the PMA scandal, Murtha is not alone. As many as six other Members of Congress are currently under scrutiny according to The Washington Post. They include: Peter J. Visclosky (D-IN.), James P. Moran Jr. (D-VA), Norm Dicks (D-WA.), Marcy Kaptur (D-OH), C.W. Bill Young (R-FL.) and Todd Tiahrt (R-KS.). Of course rather than investigate this serious scandal, according to Roll Call House Democrats circled the wagons, "cobbling together a defense to offer political cover to their rank and file.” The Washington Post also reported in 2009 that Murtha’s nephew received $4 million in Defense Department no-bid contracts: "Newly obtained documents…show Robert Murtha mentioning his influential family connection as leverage in his business dealings and holding unusual power with the military.”


10. Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY): Rangel, the man in charge of writing tax policy for the entire country, has yet to adequately explain how he could possibly "forget" to pay taxes on $75,000 in rental income he earned from his off-shore rental property. He also faces allegations that he improperly used his influence to maintain ownership of highly coveted rent-controlled apartments in Harlem, and misused his congressional office to fundraise for his private Rangel Center by preserving a tax loophole for an oil drilling company in exchange for funding. On top of all that, Rangel recently amended his financial disclosure reports, which doubled his reported wealth. (He somehow “forgot” about $1 million in assets.) And what did he do when the House Ethics Committee started looking into all of this? He apparently resorted to making "campaign contributions" to dig his way out of trouble. According to WCBS TV, a New York CBS affiliate: “The reigning member of Congress' top tax committee is apparently ‘wrangling’ other politicos to get him out of his own financial and tax troubles...Since ethics probes began last year the 79-year-old congressman has given campaign donations to 119 members of Congress, including three of the five Democrats on the House Ethics Committee who are charged with investigating him.” Charlie Rangel should not be allowed to remain in Congress, let alone serve as Chairman of the powerful House Ways and Means Committee, and he knows it. That’s why he felt the need to disburse campaign contributions to Ethics Committee members and other congressional colleagues.




Very interesting news, and not any surprises. The only surprise, and it's not really a surprise, is that they're not in jail. Yeah, right!

Anyway, we're only ten months and a few days from the first step in reclaiming our country. Don't stop fighting. Stay mad. How can we help it. They remind us daily.

Come on November, 2010.

Happy New Year

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Pick a Number--Any Number

That's what the climate change alarmist/democrat/socialist/pinko-commie-egg-sucking-dogs liberals, as Ken Hamblin used to call them, do. In the first place, I agree with Rush, when he talks about the arrogance of these one-worlders who think man can actually control the weather and atmosphere.

If that's the case, why do we have cold days in June, and hot days in December? Why can't we grow crops in the Mohave Desert, or the Arctic? Why do we have floods, and we have droughts? Hmm?

Besides, if man had any control over the earth and it's comings and goings, it would spin out of control into oblivion. Because just as we can't agree on abortion, healthscare, climate control, war, peace, immigration,border control...ad infinitum, we wouldn't be able to agree on when the sun should rise, and whether it should rise in the east or west. And what about the tides? Who would control them, and what minor roll would the moon be allowed?

In an article from The Heritage Foundation, they said this:
Many global warming activists believe 350 parts per million (ppm) of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is the upper limit before we reach climate disaster. For reference, we are currently at 390ppm and we were at 280ppm before the Industrial Revolution. Bill McKibben, founder of the group 350.org says, “It’s the most important number in the world. It’s the line between habitability on this planet and a really, really desolate future.”

The left has always picked a number and thrown it out, with the unlimited backing of the MSM. Today, for instance, I heard about the ridiculous claim by some so called scientist that within five years, there will be no ice on the polar caps during the summer. This is something that that monumental intellect, non other than Algore, himself was quoting at Copenhagen yesterday. BTW, I must say that they were quoting odds of 75% probability. I guarantee the drive-byes will run with that like it's gospel.

In that Heritage Foundation article, they quoted some scientist, Nate Lewis from Cal Tech. He ran his own numbers, where he gets them is anyone's guess, but this is something he comes up with:
• Are you a fan of nuclear? To get 10 terawatts, less than half of what we’ll need in 2050, Lewis calculates, we’d have to build 10,000 reactors, or one every other day starting now.
• Do you like wind? If you use every single breeze that blows on land, you’ll get 10 or 15 terawatts. Since it’s impossible to capture all the wind, a more realistic number is 3 terawatts, or 1 million state-of-the art turbines, and even that requires storing the energy—something we don’t know how to do—for when the wind doesn’t blow.
• Solar? To get 10 terawatts by 2050, Lewis calculates, we’d need to cover 1 million roofs with panels every day from now until then.

It's a great article. I highly recommend heading over to Heritage and reading it. Just follow this link:http://blog.heritage.org/2009/12/14/350-the-most-important-number-in-the-world-for-global-warming/

Keep your guard up, and keep fighting. We haven't lost yet.

Thursday, December 10, 2009

Climate of Arrogance and HealthScare

It's almost impossible for me to believe the arrogance of politicians and media types. It's just that I see it every day. I just read part of Newt's new column where he's talking about how the dems are losing popularity, yet still trying to force their economy-killing, country-destroying agenda down our throats.(Bold is mine, not Newt's)

The thing that amazed me about his article, was his blaming everything on the dems. I guess that's what a good republican does. However, from where I sit, they are as much to blame as the dems. Jim DeMint may be a horse of a different color, but he's the only one I've seen the word "NO" come from. I probably need to read up on him, too, because that may be in a certain context.

Another thing that boggles my mind, is that dirty hairy Reid has only a 53% disapproval rating as of 12/09/09. Do Nevadans not read and watch anything but the drive-by media? And it's not just Reid. It's the entire house. The republicans are trying to amend a bill that should be burned and buried...except that would take energy, and no more should be wasted on it.

Oh, and btw, I haven't apologized for slavery, and never will...just in case dirty hairy gets wind of this. My family didn't own any, and if they had, I still wouldn't apologize. If any apology should be forthcoming, it should come from the Africans who rounded up and sold their brothers and sisters into slavery.

(Next Day) This morning on the way to my coffee shop, I was tuned, as usual, to my local talk radio show. Bill, the host, was talking to one of our two senators, Senator Isakson. When I tuned in, Bill asked what was on the plate at the senate, and Isakson listed a few things, including healthScare and climategate. He didn't mention the three seal team members being held and tried for "allegedly" striking their prisoner.

Bill asked him about that, and Isakson (who usually votes the way I want him to vote) went into a typical political answer. It ended with him saying we shouldn't tie the hands of our military...they should be allowed to "capture and incarcerate" the enemy! WRONG! They should be allowed to KILL the enemy. No miranda rights, no handcuffs--just bang, bang, they're dead. We have the best trained, supposedly the best equipped military in history, and they spend most of their time having to train our future enemy, not to mention our present enemy. Give them a break.

Then I see they've made more deals and compromises in the so-called healthscare bill. Everyone of these crooks needs to be sent home the first chance their constituents get. Which reminds me of Ann Coulter's column last night.

There's some libtard who posts pages of lists showing his knowledge level, and he accidently, I'm sure, ended last night by suggesting impeachment. Not of HO, or any dem, of course, but it sounded like a good idea. So, I pass it on here.

Actually, I've already dreamed of impeachment and/or recall of HO, but it never hurts to bring it up again.

Come on 2010.

Tuesday, December 8, 2009

Talk radio 101

I went to my monthly writer's group Monday night. On the way home, I tuned in to a "Progressive" talk radio show...they only seem to be on late at night. This was around 10:30pm. The guy, Ed something-or-other, I think, billed himself as the top progressive on radio.

Of course, I punched a button to change channels right away, but then I decided to give him a listen. After all, I have friends who bear up to view msnbc, cnn etc. I applaud them for their efforts...this includes Rush, Glenn and Neal, of course.

Anyway, I listened on my drive home. No wonder they can't keep an audience. It was the most boring twenty minutes I've spent in a long time. One caller claimed to have been a lifelong Republican converted by the McCain campaign to HObama, (that's not too hard to believe) and another caller, sounded like another lib writer/journalist, talked about his disappointment with HO's talk to the dem senators re healthscare. Seems he was disappointed he (HO) hadn't been on the phone reading the riot act to democrat senators to get them on board with the current healthScare plan. The host alluded to the fact that he thought HO had been making the calls.

Trouble is, the dems haven't decided to fall on the old sword, yet. Maybe he should be calling the 'publicans. They sure aren't trying to protect us from the runaway freight train known as the HO administration...wonder if I should call that the HO min trail?...hmm.

In my never to be humble opinion, the Republicans are just as culpable as the dems for this healthScare debacle, if it, or anything remotely similar passes. We need to shed ourselves of every current house member, including the executive branch, and start over. Don't see how it could possibly be worse.

But then, I tend to be rather optimistic. But I just thought of something else. GLOBAL WARMING! Copenhagen! I need to go get a video aired at the summit for anyone reading this, who hasn't seen it. This was on youttube, and I found it on Heritage Foundation's site. Take a look. http://www.youtube.com/watch?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Morning%2BBell&v=NVGGgncVq-4

Can you believe the arrogance of these sobs.? They actually propose to believe we (mankind) can actually affect this planet. When I drive to my home in North Carolina, I am always reminded of the earth's recuperative powers. I see all the abandoned tobacco barns where nature is reclaiming the land. How many of you have ever seen a tree grow around a wire fence? There's an abandoned military training airport not far from Savannah. It hasn't been used since just after WWII. Nature has just about reclaimed all three of the runways.

How many time have you heard about some bug or animal being introduced to some new location with disastrous results? Every time man thinks he can do better, he learns the hard way, that God did it right in the beginning. Come to think of it, if he had meant for us to have politicians, he'd have given them to us!

Let's clean house. And for your grandchildren's sake, tell your politicians to stay out of your doctor's office.

Back to lib-talkers. They probably do better than I would, but I'm not out there trying;~))